Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Danny's Practicum Post #8
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Danny's Practicum Post #7 (Teaching Post)
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
Danny's Practicum Post #6
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Joey Bocook- Post 5
- 2 hours at group, ½ hour of response
B. Class this week
- This week Daniel, a class member, brought us his findings about how we can establish that Matthew was the author of the book of Matthew, and if his credibility is real. We discussed how we can find his credibility. Pastor Joe stated that the way we prove that Matthew was real and the author is that we cannot disprove those facts. He told us a story, which Dr. Bence also tells, about Saint Denys. He said why is this story more unbelievable than the story of the resurrection? They are both recorded by eye witnesses. So we talked about faith. This is how we come to believe that Matthew has credibility.
C. Questions
1. Does it matter that we cannot substantially prove Matthew the author of the Gospel?
2. Can we stand on faith alone?
Joey Bocook- Post 4...this somehow was deleted from blog
A. Time commitment
- 1 hour during the time and half an hour response
B. Class this week
- Nathan Miller, my R.A. and suitemate, taught out of a book called Crazy Love. He talked about how God is love and his love is so immense and deep that it is His character. His main points were that we as humans have been made in the likeness of God. So we should share this love that God has. However the conversation veered quickly when I spoke this phrase, “The bad thing is: Christians are no longer known for what they do. They are known for what they don’t do.” Here is the problem. Chris Collins pushed back and realized he had seen this in his own life throughout high school and since we have been in college. We are accustomed to living our life by a set of rules and viewing God as a ‘cosmic-kill-joy.’ As a group we decided that we must change this. Nathan continued and talked about his personal testimony and how he needs to change his motives. This was a powerful week.
C. Questions
1. What can Christians do about this identity that has come about?
2. Is it feasible to ask Christians in a class setting to embrace this “Crazy Love” and go out and actually give off “Crazy Love?”
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Chris' Practicum Post #5
Hours this week- 1(Sunday School)
This week was interesting because our teachers were gone with their son. Their son has a problem with his eye and has had eye surgery. Anyway, we had a collaborated class with some of the seniors in high school and their teacher/youth minister. It was interesting to see the difference between a teacher from the high school level and our teachers who are used to dealing with college age students.
Our class is usually pretty student lead and student driven discussion. However, I could tell a big difference in the style of teaching this week. This week we had a much more example driven, less interactive class. It was a lot of the teacher talking about the topic and less about us relating and discussing our own lives. This is something that I think is super important for all to learn in leading Sunday School or any kind of teaching setting. There is obviously a difference in how one teaches high schoolers versus college aged students. I guess what I am saying is that based on the setting, the people, and the topics, there is always more than one way to do things correctly.
Another thing that I noticed was that when he did try to get people involved and engaged, he always went and called on the same group of people. If you are going to call on people to get them engaged, you need to do it with more than just a few of the class or else it becomes a discussion between the teacher and those few whom they are engaging. It leaves the rest of the class feeling “left out.” This did not help to keep the attention of the those whom were “left out” or keep them engaged so as to gain anything from the lesson. These are the things that I have learned this week in observing our class.
Questions for this week:
How do you know when the teaching style you are using is not working? At what point are you almost “required” to change how you teach? Is it when people begin to say that they are not “getting anything from class?”
Having a blended class was different. Is it a good idea to bring two completely different classes together as one? Especially different age groups?
